Disability improvement as a clinically relevant outcome in clinical trials of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce the risk of disability worsening in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). High-efficacy DMTs can lead to confirmed or sustained disability improvement (CDI and SDI). OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Post hoc analyses of data from the TRANSFORMS, FREEDOMS, and FREEDOMS II trials and their extensions assessed the effects of fingolimod (0.5-1.25 mg/day) on stabilizing or improving disability over ⩽8 years in participants with RMS. CDI and SDI rates were compared between participants initially randomized to fingolimod, interferon (IFNß-1a), or placebo. RESULTS: At 8 years' follow-up in TRANSFORMS, 35.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.2%-43.1%) of assessed participants in the IFNß-1a-fingolimod switch group and 41.9% (36.6%-47.6%) on continuous fingolimod experienced CDI; disability did not worsen in approximately 70%. Similar results were seen in the combined FREEDOMS population. Proportionally fewer TRANSFORMS participants achieved SDI in the IFNß-1a-fingolimod switch group than on continuous fingolimod (5.4% [3.0%-9.5%] vs 14.2% [10.8%-18.4%], p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: CDI and SDI are outcomes of interest for clinical trials and for long-term follow-up of participants with RMS. Monitoring CDI and SDI in addition to disability worsening may facilitate understanding of the therapeutic benefit of RMS treatments.

The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Migraine in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Five Countries.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have estimated the burden of migraine in patients suffering from ≥ 4 monthly headache days (MHDs), but the burden experienced by migraineurs suffering from one to three (1-3) MHDs is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the incremental burden of migraine in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), impairments to work and daily activities, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK (EU5]), by comparing migraineurs with ≥ 4 MHDs and migraineurs with 1-3 MHDs. METHODS: The sample for this retrospective cross-sectional study was collected from the 2017 National Health and Wellness Survey (N = 62,000). The Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey Instrument, version-2 physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores, Short-Form 6-dimensions (SF-6D), EuroQoL 5-dimensions (EQ-5D) and EuroQoL visual analog scale (VAS) scores, impairments to work productivity and daily activities (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] Questionnaire) scores, and HRU were compared between migraineur groups with ≥ 4 MHDs (4-7, intermediate-frequency episodic migraine; 8-14, high-frequency episodic migraine; ≥ 15 chronic migraine) and the migraineur subgroup with 1-3 MHDs (low-frequency episodic migraine) using generalized linear modeling after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Data from a total of 62,000 survey respondents were examined, of whom 1323 and 1569 were considered to have 1-3 MHDs and ≥ 4 MHDs (4-7 MHDs [n = 783]; 8-14 MHDs [n = 429]; ≥ 15 MHDs [n = 357]), respectively. The adjusted HRQoL was significantly lower in the 4-7 MHDs (for MCS and SF-6D scores; p < 0.0001) and 8-14 MHDs subgroups (for MCS, SF-6D, EQ-5D, and EuroQoL VAS scores, p < 0.0001; for PCS scores, p = 0.0007) than in the 1-3 MHDs subgroup. Migraineurs with 4-7 and 8-14 MHDs reported higher activity impairment and more frequent visits to healthcare providers (all p < 0.0001) and neurologists (p = 0.0006 and p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to the 1-3 MHDs subgroup. Migraineurs with ≥ 15 MHDs had significantly lower HRQoL and increased WPAI scores and HRU than the 1-3 MHDs subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting the incremental burden of migraine, characterized by poorer HRQoL and increased WPAI scores and greater HRU, among migraineurs experiencing ≥ 4 MHDs compared with migraineurs experiencing 1-3 MHDs in the EU5.

Associations Between Headache-Free Days and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Migraine Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Survey Data in Europe.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine imposes a substantial burden on patients, society, and healthcare systems. This study aimed to assess the associations between the number of headache-free days (HFDs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with migraine in the EU5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom). METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study collected survey responses from adults aged ≥ 18 years from the 2017 National Health and Wellness Survey (N = 62,000). Migraine patients with a physician's diagnosis of migraine and who had experienced at least 4 monthly headache days in the prior month were included (N = 1569). Number of HFDs was compared with Short-Form 12-Item Survey Instrument, version 2 (SF-12v2) physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS), Short-Form-6D (SF-6D) and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) scores, WPAI, and HRU in migraine patients. Correlation analyses were conducted to test the bivariate associations, whereas generalized linear models were used for multivariable analyses. RESULTS: An increase of 1 HFD was associated with average increases of 0.171, 0.306, 0.003, and 0.008 points for MCS, PCS, SF-6D utility score, and EQ-5D index score, respectively (p < 0.001 for all). Extrapolating the results to a tenfold increase in monthly HFDs corresponded to clinically meaningful increases in PCS and EQ-5D scores. An increase of 1 HFD was associated with expected average decreases in absenteeism of 3.9% and presenteeism of 2.1%. Further, an increase of 1 HFD was associated with expected decreases in HCP visits and neurologist visits of 1.0% and 4.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: An increase in the number of HFDs was associated with better health-related outcomes in patients suffering from migraine. Further, the results demonstrate a need for more effective treatments that can reduce migraine frequency and thus improve HRQoL, increase work productivity, and reduce both activity impairment and HRU. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland.

My Migraine Voice survey: a global study of disease burden among individuals with migraine for whom preventive treatments have failed.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is associated with many debilitating symptoms that affect daily functioning. My Migraine Voice is a large global cross-sectional study aimed at understanding the full burden and impact of migraine directly from patients suffering from ≥4 monthly migraine days (MMDs) with a history of prophylactic treatment failure. METHODS: This study was conducted worldwide (31 countries across North and South Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Northern Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region) using an online survey administered to adults with migraine who reported ≥4 MMDs in the 3 months preceding survey administration, with pre-specified criteria of 90% having used preventive migraine treatment (80% with history of ≥1 treatment failure). Prophylactic treatment failure was defined as a reported change in preventive medication by individuals with migraine for any reason, at least once. RESULTS: In total, 11,266 individuals participated in the survey. Seventy-four percent of the participants reported spending time in darkness/isolation due to migraine (average: 19 h/month). While 85% of all respondents reported negative aspects of living with migraine (feeling helpless, depressed, not understood), sleeping difficulties (83%), and fear of the next attack (55%), 57% shared ≥1 positive aspect (learning to cope, becoming a stronger person). Forty-nine percent reported feeling limited in daily activities throughout all migraine phases. Migraine impact on professional, private, or social domains was reported by 87% of respondents (51% in all domains). In the previous 12 months, 38% of respondents had visited the emergency department (average: 3.3 visits), whereas 23% stayed in hospital overnight (average: 3.2 nights) due to migraine. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of migraine is substantial among this cohort of individuals with at least 4 migraine days per month and for whom at least 1 preventive migraine treatment had failed. Interestingly, respondents reported some positive aspects in their migraine journey; the greater resilience and strength brought on by coping with migraine suggests that if future treatments could address existing unmet needs, these individuals with migraine will be able to maximize their contribution to society.

Patients' perspective on the burden of migraine in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis of survey data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a distinct neurological disease that imposes a significant burden on patients, society, and the healthcare system. This study aimed to characterize the incremental burden of migraine in individuals who suffer from ≥4 monthly headache days (MHDs) by examining health-related quality of life (HRQoL), impairments to work productivity and daily activities, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in the EU5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom). METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the 2016 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS; N = 80,600). Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2) physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS), Short-form-6D (SF-6D), and EuroQoL (EQ-5D), impairments to work productivity and daily activities (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), and HRU were compared between migraine respondents suffering from ≥4 MHDs (n = 218) and non-migraine controls (n = 218) by propensity score matching using sociodemographic characteristics. Chi-square, T-tests, and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to determine significant differences between the groups after propensity score matching. RESULTS: HRQoL was lower in migraine individuals suffering from ≥4 MHDs compared with non-migraine controls, with reduced SF-36v2 PCS (46.00 vs 50.51) and MCS (37.69 vs 44.82), SF-6D health state utility score (0.62 vs 0.71), and EQ-5D score (0.68 vs 0.81) (for all, p < 0.001). Respondents with migraine suffering from ≥4 MHDs also reported higher levels of absenteeism from work (14.43% vs 9.46%; p = 0.001), presenteeism (35.52% vs 20.97%), overall work impairment (38.70% vs 23.27%), and activity impairment (44.17% vs 27.75%) than non-migraine controls (for all, p < 0.001). Additionally, HRU was significantly higher for individuals with ≥4 MHDs compared to their matched controls. Consistently, migraine subgroups (4-7 MHDs, 8-14 MHDs and CM) had lower HRQoL, greater overall work and activity impairment, and higher HRU compared to non-migraine controls. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine of ≥4 MHDs was associated with poorer HRQoL, greater work productivity loss, and higher HRU compared with non-migraine controls. The findings of the study suggest that an unmet need exists among individuals suffering from ≥4 MHDs in the EU5 suggesting the need for effective prophylactic treatments to lessen the humanistic and economic burden of migraine.

Aliskiren alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with the lower ranges of stage 2 hypertension: The ACQUIRE randomized double-blind study.

Patients with stage 2 hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥160mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥100mm Hg) are at high cardiovascular risk and require intensive blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapy. This randomized double-blind study is the first prospective trial specifically designed to evaluate the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in patients with a mean sitting SBP ≥160 mm Hg and <180mm Hg (the lower ranges of stage 2 systolic hypertension). After a 2- to 4-week washout period, 688 patients were randomized to once-daily aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 150/12.5mg or aliskiren 150mg for 1 week and then double the doses for 11 weeks. Baseline BP was 167.1/95.0mm Hg. At week 12, both aliskiren/HCT and aliskiren provided substantial BP reductions from baseline (30.0/12.6 mm Hg and 20.3/8.2 mm Hg, respectively). Aliskiren/HCT lowered BP significantly more than aliskiren (least-squares mean between-treatment differences [95% confidence interval] were -9.7 [-12.0 to -7.4] for SBP and -4.5 [-5.8 to -3.2] for DBP; both P<.0001). Similar BP reductions were seen in the subgroups of patients with isolated systolic hypertension and obesity. Aliskiren, with or without HCT, provides clinically significant BP reductions and may therefore be an effective treatment option in patients with stage 2 hypertension.